Re: [PATCH] ring-buffer-benchmark: Fix the wrong sched_priority of producer

[Steven Rostedt]

On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 08:12:37 +0000
Wang Long <long.wangl...@huawei.com> wrote:

> The producer should be used producer_fifo as its sched_priority,
> so correct it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wang Long <long.wangl...@huawei.com>

I also add this for stable 2.6.33+

Thanks, applied.

-- Steve

> ---
>  kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c 
> b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
> index 13d945c..1b28df2 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
> @@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ static int __init ring_buffer_benchmark_init(void)
>  
>       if (producer_fifo >= 0) {
>               struct sched_param param = {
> -                     .sched_priority = consumer_fifo
> +                     .sched_priority = producer_fifo
>               };
>               sched_setscheduler(producer, SCHED_FIFO, &param);
>       } else

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/