[PATCH] ring-buffer-benchmark: Fix the wrong sched_priority of producer

[Wang Long]

The producer should be used producer_fifo as its sched_priority,
so correct it.

Signed-off-by: Wang Long <long.wangl...@huawei.com>
---
 kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c 
b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
index 13d945c..1b28df2 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
@@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ static int __init ring_buffer_benchmark_init(void)
 
        if (producer_fifo >= 0) {
                struct sched_param param = {
-                       .sched_priority = consumer_fifo
+                       .sched_priority = producer_fifo
                };
                sched_setscheduler(producer, SCHED_FIFO, &param);
        } else
-- 
1.8.3.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/