On 06/08, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > I tend to agree, but I think its a pre-existing problem, not one > > introduced by my proposed patch. > > Something like this would fix that I think. It fully preserves > timer->state over hrtimer_start_range_ns().
Yes, but I think we can do a bit better. Only for initial review, I need to re-check this... And. I think that after you remove STATE_CALLBACK we can even kill timer->state altogether, but this is another story. What do you think? Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
