On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcg...@suse.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez <mcg...@suse.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez >> <mcg...@do-not-panic.com> wrote: >>> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcg...@suse.com> >>> >>> If and when this gets enabled the driver could should split >>> up IO memory space properly and that is quite a bit of work. >>> Just remove the uncommented dead MTRR code then. >>> >>> There are a few motivations for this: >>> >>> a) Take advantage of PAT when available >>> >>> b) Help bury MTRR code away, MTRR is architecture specific and on >>> x86 its replaced by PAT >>> >>> c) Help with the goal of eventually using _PAGE_CACHE_UC over >>> _PAGE_CACHE_UC_MINUS on x86 on ioremap_nocache() (see commit >>> de33c442e titled "x86 PAT: fix performance drop for glx, >>> use UC minus for ioremap(), ioremap_nocache() and >>> pci_mmap_page_range()") >> >> Hey folks, who's tree should this go through if agreeable? > > OK its been over 1 month without any replies on this patch which just > removes commented out code. > > All the maintainers below bounce and the only e-mail not bouncing is > for Sreekanth Reddy <sreekanth.re...@avagotech.com>, he hasn't been > seen active on linux-next since Jan 12 2015 when he did a driver bump > for mpt2sas to 20.100.00.00. > > What's going on folks? And can this patch go in? > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > index aca2886..73dbc02 100644 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -6205,10 +6205,7 @@ S: Maintained > F: arch/arm/mach-lpc32xx/ > > LSILOGIC MPT FUSION DRIVERS (FC/SAS/SPI) > -M: Nagalakshmi Nandigama <nagalakshmi.nandig...@avagotech.com> > -M: Praveen Krishnamoorthy <praveen.krishnamoor...@avagotech.com> > M: Sreekanth Reddy <sreekanth.re...@avagotech.com> > -M: Abhijit Mahajan <abhijit.maha...@avagotech.com> > L: mpt-fusionlinux....@avagotech.com > L: linux-s...@vger.kernel.org > W: http://www.lsilogic.com/support
OK so Avago bought Broadcom. Does that impact how Avago will contribute to the Linux kernel? It has been well over 1 month and I haven't seen any reply from Avago folks. Andrew, is the silence sufficient enough reason for this patch to go instead through your tree? Luis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
