On Mon, 1 Jun 2015, Baolin Wang wrote:
Subject line is horrible again.
"timekeeping: Introduce current_kernel_time64()"
Is precise and sufficient.
> This patch adds current_kernel_time64() function with timespec64 type,
> and makes current_kernel_time() 'static inline' and moves it to timekeeping.h
> file.
Again, you describe WHAT the patch is doing first and clutter the
changelog with completely irrelevant information.
> It is convenient for user to get the current kernel time with timespec64 type,
What's conveniant about it?
> and delete the current_kernel_time() function easily in timekeeping.h file.
> That
> is ready for 2038 when get the current time.
This makes no sense at all.
Again you should describe WHY current_kernel_time() must be replaced.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
