On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 10:29:39PM +0200, Mateusz Kulikowski wrote:
> On 13.05.2015 10:22, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 10:00:13PM +0200, Mateusz Kulikowski wrote:
> >> On 11.05.2015 10:26, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> (...)
> >>>
> >>> Which part isn't aligned?  I think they both are.
> >>>
> >> struct rtllib_rxb *prxb = prxbIndicateArray[j];
> >>
> >> struct rtllib_rxb {
> >>    u8 nr_subframes;
> >>    struct sk_buff *subframes[MAX_SUBFRAME_COUNT == 64];
> >>    u8 dst[ETH_ALEN]; // here
> >>    u8 src[ETH_ALEN]; // here
> >> } __packed;
> >>
> >> Either I forgot alignment / packing rules or this fields are never aligned 
> >> "by design".
> > 
> > You must have forgotten something...  Everything after the pointer is
> > going to be aligned sizeof(void *).
> 
> That would be true, if structure was not __packed:
> 

Oh.  Duh...  You are correct.

I'm not positive it's "by design" though, this is staging code so maybe
they just added __packed to every struct.  In fact, I'm pretty sure
unaligned pointers don't work on some arches so the __packed is probably
a bug.

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to