From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Because gcc doesn't realize that rcu_num_lvls must be strictly greater
than zero, some versions give a spurious warning about levelcnt[0] being
uninitialized in rcu_init_one().  This commit updates the condition on
the pre-existing panic() in order to educate gcc on this point.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index c34422d92aa9..9b076b284695 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -3982,9 +3982,9 @@ static void __init rcu_init_one(struct rcu_state *rsp,
 
        BUILD_BUG_ON(MAX_RCU_LVLS > ARRAY_SIZE(buf));  /* Fix buf[] init! */
 
-       /* Silence gcc 4.8 warning about array index out of range. */
-       if (rcu_num_lvls > RCU_NUM_LVLS)
-               panic("rcu_init_one: rcu_num_lvls overflow");
+       /* Silence gcc 4.8 false positive about array index out of range. */
+       if (rcu_num_lvls <= 0 || rcu_num_lvls > RCU_NUM_LVLS)
+               panic("rcu_init_one: rcu_num_lvls out of range");
 
        /* Initialize the level-tracking arrays. */
 
-- 
1.8.1.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to