On 10.05.2015 15:20, Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 11:18:51PM +0200, Mateusz Kulikowski wrote: >> Comment unaligned memcpy() that trigger PREFER_ETHER_ADDR_COPY >> checkpatch.pl warning. >> It will prevent accidential "Fix" to ether_addr_copy(). > > What do you mean by this? Why will the comment remove the issue? >
It will not, It will prevent people from sending checkpatch 'fixes' until I (or someone else) will submit ultimate fix - that is ether_addr_copy_unaligned(). I didn't included it into this series, as this requires cross-tree synchronization (net + staging) and I prefer to do it later in a smaller changeset (2 patches - one for net, one for staging). If you think it's unnecessary, I'll throw it away in v4. Regards, Mateusz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
