On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:10:32AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > So I'd vote for Frederic's CONFIG_ISOLATION=y, mostly because this is > a high level kernel feature, so it won't conflict with isolation > concepts in lower level subsystems such as IOMMU isolation - and other > higher level features like scheduler isolation are basically another > partial implementation we want to merge with all this... >
But why do we need a CONFIG flag for something that has no content? That is, I do not see anything much; except the 'I want to stay in userspace and kill me otherwise' flag, and I'm not sure that warrants a CONFIG flag like this. Other than that, its all a combination of NOHZ_FULL and cpusets/isolcpus and whatnot. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
