* Dave Hansen <dave.han...@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On 05/05/2015 10:58 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > struct xregs_state { > > struct fxregs_state i387; > > struct xstate_header header; > > - struct ymmh_struct ymmh; > > - struct lwp_struct lwp; > > - struct bndreg bndreg[4]; > > - struct bndcsr bndcsr; > > - /* New processor state extensions will go here. */ > > + u8 __reserved[XSTATE_RESERVE]; > > } __attribute__ ((packed, aligned (64))); > > Just to reiterate. The size of 'XSTATE_RESERVE' is completely > unknown at compile time. [...]
Yes, see my previous mail. > [...] It's wrong in the existing kernel, but we should fix it up > instead of mucking with it like this. I'm not mucking with it, I'm slowly migrating it towards a dynamic model that doesn't suck - see my other mails. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/