* Dave Hansen <dave.han...@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> On 05/05/2015 10:58 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >  struct xregs_state {
> >     struct fxregs_state             i387;
> >     struct xstate_header            header;
> > -   struct ymmh_struct              ymmh;
> > -   struct lwp_struct               lwp;
> > -   struct bndreg                   bndreg[4];
> > -   struct bndcsr                   bndcsr;
> > -   /* New processor state extensions will go here. */
> > +   u8                              __reserved[XSTATE_RESERVE];
> >  } __attribute__ ((packed, aligned (64)));
> 
> Just to reiterate.  The size of 'XSTATE_RESERVE' is completely 
> unknown at compile time.  [...]

Yes, see my previous mail.

> [...] It's wrong in the existing kernel, but we should fix it up 
> instead of mucking with it like this.

I'm not mucking with it, I'm slowly migrating it towards a dynamic 
model that doesn't suck - see my other mails.

Thanks,

        Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to