On 04/21/2015 05:23 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 20 Apr 2015, Preeti U Murthy wrote: > >> On 04/15/2015 02:38 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >>>> Now that we have the active_bases field in sync we can use it for >> >> This sentence appears a bit ambiguous. I am guessing you are referring >> to what the first patch in this series did, in which case wouldn't it be >> better if it is stated a bit more elaborately like 'Now that it is >> guaranteed that active_bases field will be in sync with the timerqueue >> on the corresponding clock base' ? It took me a while to figure out what >> the statement was referring to. > > Indeed. I'm going to rephrase that.
Thanks. Reviewed-by: Preeti U. Murthy <pre...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > Thanks, > > tglx > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
