On Mon, 20 Apr 2015, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> On 04/15/2015 02:38 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >>Now that we have the active_bases field in sync we can use it for
>
> This sentence appears a bit ambiguous. I am guessing you are referring
> to what the first patch in this series did, in which case wouldn't it be
> better if it is stated a bit more elaborately like 'Now that it is
> guaranteed that active_bases field will be in sync with the timerqueue
> on the corresponding clock base' ? It took me a while to figure out what
> the statement was referring to.
Indeed. I'm going to rephrase that.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
