Hi! > > You said earlier we only should fix drivers that need fixing, but they > > all need fixing > > I think you're still talking from a theoretical standpoing, while all my > arguments are practical. > > In _practice_, I hope that > > (a) we don't see that very much (ie the people for whom things work > already are a strong argument that this is less of a problem in > practice than people try to make it appear) > > (b) drivers, _especially_ on notebooks, are already able to handle an > incoming interrupt with the device in D3 state and returning 0xff > for all reads. > > In particular, this is exactly the same thing that you get on a > surprise device removal too.
Not all devices that we want power-managed are hot-pluggable, even on notebooks. If I need to go all over the tree fixing drivers, I'd much rather add free_irq/request_irq than mess with interrupt routines on hardware I don't have... Pavel -- if you have sharp zaurus hardware you don't need... you know my address - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/