On Tue, 2005-08-02 at 12:56 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > Also, as I said earlier, the better we support OSPM initiated power > > > management, the more likely APM will break. This may be technically > > > unavoidable on some isolated boxes without quirks. I agree with > > > Pavel that "do nothing" may make sense, but it seems some devices > > > may still need to be disabled by the OS. As a real world example, > > > we currently can't turn off cardbus bridges because it breaks APM > > > on a couple of older laptops. > > > > Won't freeing of IRQs cause problems with things like handhelds that > > actually rely on an interrupt to wake up ? > > Well, you probably don't want to free IRQ that is used for wakeup; but > if driver is used for wakeup, it probably needs some special handling, > anyway (right?).
Not necessarily something the driver itself knows about ... For example, some platforms do a hardware OR between PME and INTA ... Ben. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/