> > This is equivalent to today where the checks are per node rather than
> > per port.
> >
> > Should all checks here be port 1 based or only certain ones like listen
> > ? For example, in connect/reject/disconnect, don't we already have port
> > ? Guess this can be dealt with later as this is not a regression from
> > the current implementation.
>
> Yeah, these parts of cma may need more carve in future, like some new
> callback
> for different CM type as Sean suggested.
>
> Maybe directly using 1 could help to highlight the problem ;-)
Only a few checks need to be per device. I think I pointed those out
previously. Testing should show anywhere that we miss fairly quickly, since
port would still be 0. For the checks that can be updated to be per port, I
would rather go ahead and convert them.
- Sean
N�����r��y����b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+����{����zX����ܨ}���Ơz�&j:+v�������zZ+��+zf���h���~����i���z� �w���?�����&�)ߢf��^jǫy�m��@A�a���
0��h���i
