On 04/16/2015 03:42 PM, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
> On 4/16/2015 9:41 AM, Michael Wang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 04/16/2015 03:36 PM, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
>> [snip]
>>>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdma_node_get_transport);
>>>> -
>>>> enum rdma_link_layer rdma_port_get_link_layer(struct ib_device *device,
>>>> u8 port_num)
>>>> {
>>>> if (device->get_link_layer)
>>>> diff --git a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
>>>> index 262bf44..f9ef479 100644
>>>> --- a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
>>>> +++ b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
>>>> @@ -84,9 +84,6 @@ enum rdma_transport_type {
>>>> RDMA_TRANSPORT_IBOE,
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> -__attribute_const__ enum rdma_transport_type
>>>> -rdma_node_get_transport(enum rdma_node_type node_type);
>>>> -
>>>> enum rdma_link_layer {
>>>> IB_LINK_LAYER_UNSPECIFIED,
>>>
>>> Is IB_LINK_LAYER_UNSPECIFIED still possible ?
>>
>> Actually it's impossible in kernel at first, all those who implemented the
>> callback
>> won't return UNSPECIFIED, others all have the correct transport type
>> (otherwise BUG())
>> and won't result UNSPECIFIED :-)
>
> Should it be removed from this enum somewhere in this patch series
> (perhaps early on) ?
It was still directly used by helper like ib_modify_qp_is_ok() as indicator,
may be
better in another following patch to reform those part :-)
Regards,
Michael Wang
>
> -- Hal
>
>> Regards,
>> Michael Wang
>>
>>>
>>>> IB_LINK_LAYER_INFINIBAND,
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
