On 04/16/2015 03:36 PM, Hal Rosenstock wrote:
[snip]
>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(rdma_node_get_transport);
>> -
>> enum rdma_link_layer rdma_port_get_link_layer(struct ib_device *device, u8
>> port_num)
>> {
>> if (device->get_link_layer)
>> diff --git a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
>> index 262bf44..f9ef479 100644
>> --- a/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
>> +++ b/include/rdma/ib_verbs.h
>> @@ -84,9 +84,6 @@ enum rdma_transport_type {
>> RDMA_TRANSPORT_IBOE,
>> };
>>
>> -__attribute_const__ enum rdma_transport_type
>> -rdma_node_get_transport(enum rdma_node_type node_type);
>> -
>> enum rdma_link_layer {
>> IB_LINK_LAYER_UNSPECIFIED,
>
> Is IB_LINK_LAYER_UNSPECIFIED still possible ?
Actually it's impossible in kernel at first, all those who implemented the
callback
won't return UNSPECIFIED, others all have the correct transport type (otherwise
BUG())
and won't result UNSPECIFIED :-)
Regards,
Michael Wang
>
>> IB_LINK_LAYER_INFINIBAND,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
