On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 11:21:56AM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote: > Apparently the body of the commit message isn't as clear as it might be :-) > > It does say the same thing, though, basically that if nohz_full DOESN'T > imply isolcpus, that's a bad thing. I'm happy to reword the text to avoid > the double negative and say: > > nohz_full is only useful with isolcpus also set, since otherwise the > scheduler has to run periodically to try to determine whether to steal > work from other cores.
But you're doing the reverse! You're setting nohz_full for isolcpus, not limiting the nohz_full mask to isolcpus. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
