On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 10:04:43AM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote: > On 04/08/2015 05:41 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > >On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 02:16:45PM -0400, cmetc...@ezchip.com wrote: > >>From: Chris Metcalf <cmetc...@ezchip.com> > >> > >>It's not clear that nohz_full is useful without isolcpus also > >>set, since otherwise the scheduler has to run periodically to > >>try to determine whether to steal work from other cores. > >So the Changelog and the patch don't seem to agree with one another. > > > >The Changelog states that nohz_full should depend on isolcpus. > > The git commit message says "make nohz_full imply isolcpus". > That's consistent with the code.
Well, but then the Changelog doesn't make any sense. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
