* Seiichi Ikarashi <s.ikara...@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2015-04-08 15:28, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Seiichi Ikarashi <s.ikara...@jp.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> If you turn off a PCI device whose driver has set affinity_hint,
> >> you will get warning message which does _not_ explain the reason
> >> why it appeared from the user's point of view.
> >>
> >> # echo 0 > /sys/bus/pci/slots/65/power
> >>
> >> Apr 28 20:29:39 localhost kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------
> >> Apr 28 20:29:39 localhost kernel: WARNING: at kernel/irq/manage.c:1002
> >> __free_irq+0x22d/0x250() (Tainted: P --------------- )
> >> (snip)
> >>
> >> Users will misunderstand some problem has happened
> >> even though he or she succeeded to turn off the device.
> >> I suppose this warning was originally for a debug purpose
> >> for driver developers and has incidentally been left.
> >>
> >> Just remove the warning is good and enough.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Seiichi Ikarashi <s.ikara...@jp.fujitsu.com>
> >>
> >> --- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
> >> +++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
> >> @@ -1335,7 +1335,7 @@ static struct irqaction *__free_irq(unsi
> >>
> >> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> >> /* make sure affinity_hint is cleaned up */
> >> - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(desc->affinity_hint))
> >> + if (desc->affinity_hint)
> >> desc->affinity_hint = NULL;
> >
> > Well, drivers that are using irq_set_affinity_hint() are expected to
> > call:
> >
> > irq_set_affinity_hint(irq, NULL);
> >
> > to clear the affinity mask, before releasing the irq. This warning
> > flags drivers that forgot to do that and which might thus leak a
> > dynamically allocated CPU mask (and/or other resources).
>
> Calling irq_set_affinity_hint(irq, NULL) does not guarantee that the
> driver does not forget to deallocate a dynamically allocated CPU
> mask and/or other resources. [...]
I said 'might leak', not 'guaranteed to leak'.
Calling irq_set_affinity_hint(irq, NULL) is the way this kernel API is
specified to be used. Forgetting to do it is a kernel driver bug and
triggers a warning message from the kernel's IRQ subsystem.
> [...] But if calling it with NULL 2nd-arg before releasing the irq
> is a virtual rule of using irq_set_affinity_hint() interface, I
> understand it.
>
> > Feel free to turn the warning message into a more informative
> > WARN() that will blame the driver that triggered it, if the stack
> > dump into the driver wasn't a clue enough ...
>
> Still, I do not know leaving the warning message is effective to
> prevent drivers from potentially leaking resource... considering a
> kind of cost-effectivenss. Business users (not developers) hate such
> kind of messages for developers.
it's a warning message pointing out a kernel bug: that
irq_set_affinity_hint(irq, NULL) was not called properly.
Messages pointing out kernel bugs should be fixed, not hidden.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
