On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 11:17:48AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > This patch changes the lock ordering (behavior change) and it's not > described in the changelog. Please figure out which way is the correct > ordering and resend.
Actually the original ordering was obviously correct. You can't take a mutex if you are holding a spinlock. So it always has to be: mutex_lock(); spin_lock(); spin_unlock(); mutext_unlock(); regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
