On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net> wrote:
>
> Does it matter on 32-bit kernels? There's no swapgs, so IRQs should
> still be safe, and we have a real stack pointer before sysexit.
Fair enough. On 32-bit, the only worry is the race between "return to
user space" and "something set a thread flag", resulting in delayed
signals and/or higher scheduling latency etc. So on 32-bit, the bug is
much less of an issue, I agree.
So yeah, using sysretl instead of sti+sysexit on 64-bit sounds more
reasonable given the potential worry about sti+sysexit atomicity in
the presense of nmi's.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
