* Andy Lutomirski <l...@kernel.org> wrote:

> We currently have a race: if we're preempted during syscall exit, we
> can fail to process syscall return work that is queued up while
> we're preempted in ret_from_sys_call after checking ti.flags.
> 
> Fix it by disabling interrupts before checking ti.flags.
> 
> Fixes: 96b6352c1271 x86_64, entry: Remove the syscall exit audit and schedule 
> optimizations
> Reported-by: Stefan Seyfried <stefan.seyfr...@googlemail.com>
> Reported-by: Takashi Iwai <ti...@suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <l...@kernel.org>
> ---
> 
> Ingo, I don't understand the LOCKDEP_SYS_EXIT stuff.  Can you take a quick
> look to confirm that it's okay to call it more than once?
So the essence is that it wants to print this warning if we are 
holding a lock after a syscall:

                printk("[ BUG: lock held when returning to user space! ]\n");

it manipulates no state and is not sensitive to whether it's called 
before or after return-work processing.

> arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S | 18 ++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
> index 1d74d161687c..2babb393915e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S
> @@ -364,12 +364,21 @@ system_call_fastpath:
>   * Has incomplete stack frame and undefined top of stack.
>   */
>  ret_from_sys_call:
> -     testl $_TIF_ALLWORK_MASK,TI_flags+THREAD_INFO(%rsp,RIP-ARGOFFSET)
> -     jnz int_ret_from_sys_call_fixup /* Go the the slow path */
> -
>       LOCKDEP_SYS_EXIT
>       DISABLE_INTERRUPTS(CLBR_NONE)
>       TRACE_IRQS_OFF
> +
> +     /*
> +      * We must check ti flags with interrupts (or at least preemption)
> +      * off because we must *never* return to userspace without
> +      * processing exit work that is enqueued if we're preempted here.
> +      * In particular, returning to userspace with any of the one-shot
> +      * flags (TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME, TIF_USER_RETURN_NOTIFY, etc) set is
> +      * very bad.
> +      */
> +     testl $_TIF_ALLWORK_MASK,TI_flags+THREAD_INFO(%rsp,RIP-ARGOFFSET)
> +     jnz int_ret_from_sys_call_fixup /* Go the the slow path */

Should be safe to call it once again after user-work processing has 
been finished.

I've picked up your fix for tip:x86/urgent.

Thanks,

        Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to