Roman Zippel wrote: > The point is to design a simple and flexible relayfs layer, which means > not every possible function has to be done in the relayfs layer, as long > it's flexible enough to build additional functionality on top of it (for > which it can again provide some library functions).
I guess I just don't get the point here. Why cut something away if many users will need it. If it's that popular that you're ready to provide a library function to do it, then why not just leave it to boot? One of the goals of relayfs is to avoid code duplication with regards to buffering in general. Karim -- Author, Speaker, Developer, Consultant Pushing Embedded and Real-Time Linux Systems Beyond the Limits http://www.opersys.com || [EMAIL PROTECTED] || 1-866-677-4546 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
