Hareesh Nagarajan writes: > Tom Zanussi wrote: > > Roman Zippel writes: > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Tom Zanussi wrote: > > > > > > > The netlink control channel seems to work very well, but I can > > > > certainly change the examples to use something different. Could you > > > > suggest something? > > > > > > It just looks like a complicated way to do an ioctl, a control file > > that > > > you can read/write would be a lot simpler and faster. > > > > You're right - in previous versions, we did use ioctl - we ended up > > using netlink as it seemed like least offensive option to most people. > > I'll try modifying the example code to use a control file or something > > like that instead though. > > Having an ioctl() interface will definitely make things less > complicated. Are the older versions which use ioctl available off the > relayfs website?
Yes, the 'old relayfs' patches on the website implement ioctl. Tom - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
