>1. Firing patches at the list, without copying them to a maintainer,
>often means that they are ignored.  Perhaps this should be sent to
>the trivial maintainer (unless the documentation maintainer thinks
>this is within his area - I have not looked to see if anybody admits
>to maintaining this).

'/scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f README' only yeilds LKML,yes, maybe this patch
should be sent to the trivial maintainer or the doc maintainer.

>
>2. Perhaps you should also mention .xz variants ?  Actually, on a

Will turn to xz, thx.

>version of tar from the last few years, tar -xf
>linux-4.X.tar.{gz,bz,xz} "just works".  But I'm sure that some people
>who deliberately test on antique userspace (and perhaps people who
>do not use gnu tar) might take a different view on that.
>
>ĸen
>-- 
>Nanny Ogg usually went to bed early. After all, she was an old lady.
>Sometimes she went to bed as early as 6 a.m.
N�����r��y����b�X��ǧv�^�)޺{.n�+����{����zX����ܨ}���Ơz�&j:+v�������zZ+��+zf���h���~����i���z��w���?�����&�)ߢf��^jǫy�m��@A�a���
0��h���i

Reply via email to