On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Tolga Ceylan <tolga.cey...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:30 PM, Joe Perches <j...@perches.com> wrote:
>>
>> Might as well remove the unnecessary cast too:
>>
>>                 memcpy(skb->cb, &dev, sizeof(dev));
>>
>> but it might be better to avoid the memcpy and use an assign
>>
>>         *(struct net_device *)skb->cb = dev;
>>
>

Should I sent a new set of patches (including memcpy change)?
Or reply to the series with a single memcpy change patch?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to