> >>>>>>>>> Can you please fix up your patches based on my tree:
> >>>>>>>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jkirsher/que
> >>>>>>>>> ue.git
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Yes. I haven't noticed your tree.
> >>>>>>>> Will resend patches against it.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I encountered an issue with your tree, the commit id is below.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> $ git log | head
> >>>>>>> commit e6f1649780f8f5a87299bf6af04453f93d1e3d5e
> >>>>>>> Author: Rasmus Villemoes <li...@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
> >>>>>>> Date: Fri Jan 23 20:43:14 2015 -0800
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ethernet: fm10k: Actually drop 4 bits
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The comment explains the intention, but vid has type u16. Before
> >> the
> >>>>>>> inner shift, it is promoted to int, which has plenty of space for
> >>>>>>> all
> >>>>>>> vid's bits, so nothing is dropped. Use a simple mask instead.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I use the kernel from your tree in both host and guest.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Assign an IPv6 for VF in guest.
> >>>>>>> # ip -6 addr add 2001:db8::18:1/64 dev ens0
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Send ping packet from other server to the VM.
> >>>>>>> # ping6 2001:db8::18:1 -I eth0
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The following message was shown.
> >>>>>>> ixgbevf 0000:00:08.0: partial checksum but l4 proto=3a!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> If I did the same operation in the host, I saw the same error
> >>>>>>> message in
> >>>>> host too.
> >>>>>>> ixgbe 0000:2d:00.0: partial checksum but l4 proto=3a!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Do you have any idea about that?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Ah, sorry about that, try this tree again:
> >>>>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jkirsher/queue.git
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> That patch was dropped for favor of a patch that Matthew Vick
> >>>>>> put together (and recently got pushed upstream). So my queue no
> >>>>>> longer has that patch in the queue, since it got dropped.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I still see the same error, the head id is the below
> >>>>>
> >>>>> $ git log | head
> >>>>> commit a072afb0b45904022b76deef3b770ee9a93cb13a
> >>>>> Author: Nicholas Krause <xerofo...@gmail.com>
> >>>>> Date: Mon Feb 9 00:27:00 2015 -0800
> >>>>>
> >>>>> igb: Remove outdated fix me comment in the
> >>>>> function,gb_acquire_swfw_sync_i210
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> thanks,
> >>>>> Hiroshi
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm having our validation see if they can recreate the same issue
> >>>> internally. When they get back to me I'll let you
> >>> know
> >>>> what we found.
> >>>
> >>> We did bisect, and the below looks the culprit;
> >>>
> >>> 32dce968dd987adfb0c00946d78dad9154f64759 is the first bad commit
> >>> commit 32dce968dd987adfb0c00946d78dad9154f64759
> >>> Author: Vlad Yasevich <vyasev...@gmail.com>
> >>> Date: Sat Jan 31 10:40:18 2015 -0500
> >>>
> >>> ipv6: Allow for partial checksums on non-ufo packets
> >>>
> >>> Currntly, if we are not doing UFO on the packet, all UDP
> >>> packets will start with CHECKSUM_NONE and thus perform full
> >>> checksum computations in software even if device support
> >>> IPv6 checksum offloading.
> >>>
> >>> Let's start start with CHECKSUM_PARTIAL if the device
> >>> supports it and we are sending only a single packet at
> >>> or below mtu size.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Vladislav Yasevich <vyase...@redhat.com>
> >>> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
> >>>
> >>> :040000 040000 4437eaf7e944f5a6136ebf668a256fee688fda3d
> >> fade8da998d35c8da97a15f0556949ad371e5347 M net
> >>
> >> When I reverted the commit, the issue was solved.
> >>
> >> thanks,
> >> Hiroshi
> >
> > I believe the issue is that this patch (32dce968dd98 - ipv6: Allow for
> > partial checksums on non-ufo packets) is that
> it now sets CHECKSUM_PARTIAL on all IPv6 packets including ICMPv6 ones. Our
> HW (82599) only supports checksum offload
> on TCP/UDP (NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM) so we get hung up on the skb's protocol and
> the fact that it is CHECKSUM_PARTIAL.
> >
> > Another thing that confuses me is the feature test in this patch. It
> > checks (rt->dst.dev->features & NETIF_F_V6_CSUM)
> but NETIF_F_V6_CSUM is a two bit field?
> >
> > #define NETIF_F_V6_CSUM (NETIF_F_GEN_CSUM | NETIF_F_IPV6_CSUM)
> >
> > So the test would succeed if either bit was high, that doesn't seem right.
> > I cc'd the author so maybe he could clue
> us in.
>
> This has been addressed by:
> commit bf250a1fa769f2eb8fc7a4e28b3b523e9cb67eef
> Author: Vlad Yasevich <vyasev...@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue Feb 10 11:37:29 2015 -0500
>
> ipv6: Partial checksum only UDP packets
>
>
> As far the 2 bit issue, GEN_CSUM (HW_SUM) and IPV6_CSUM can not coexist at
> the same time.
> See netdev_fix_features().
>
thanks for pointing it. I will test with that commit.
Jeff's tree hasn't included that commit yet, right?
Which branch has the commit?
thanks,
Hiroshi
N�����r��y����b�X��ǧv�^�){.n�+����{����zX����ܨ}���Ơz�&j:+v�������zZ+��+zf���h���~����i���z� �w���?�����&�)ߢf��^jǫy�m��@A�a���
0��h���i
