On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 11:38 -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > >> Lots of people have switched from 2.4 to 2.6 (100 Hz to 1000 Hz) with no > >> impact in > >> stability, AFAIK. (I only remember some weird warning about HZ with debian > >> woody's > >> ps). > >> > > > > Yes, that's called "progress" so no one complained. Going back is > > called a "regression". People don't like those as much. > > That's a very subjective viewpoint. Realize that this is a balancing > act between latency and overhead ... and you're firmly only looking > at one side of the argument, instead of taking a comprimise in the > middle ...
I won't deny this for a second, I'm 100% arguing from the POV of one of Alan's 'multimedia weenies'. I do think that if you propose a big change the burden of proof is on you to justify it, ideally with some hard numbers. Lee - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
