>> Lots of people have switched from 2.4 to 2.6 (100 Hz to 1000 Hz) with no >> impact in >> stability, AFAIK. (I only remember some weird warning about HZ with debian >> woody's >> ps). >> > > Yes, that's called "progress" so no one complained. Going back is > called a "regression". People don't like those as much.
That's a very subjective viewpoint. Realize that this is a balancing act between latency and overhead ... and you're firmly only looking at one side of the argument, instead of taking a comprimise in the middle ... If I start arguing for 100HZ on the grounds that it's much more efficient, will that make 250/300 look much better to you? ;-) M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
