--Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (on Monday, July 11, 2005 20:30:59 -0400):
> On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 14:39 -0600, Chris Friesen wrote: >> Lee Revell wrote: >> >> > Tickless + sub HZ timers is a win for everyone, the multimedia people >> > get better latency, and the laptop people get to run longer. >> >> IIRC it's not a win for many systems. Throughput goes down due to timer >> manipulation overhead. > > Makes sense. Anyway, this whole thread has been pretty hand wavey, I > propose that until we see some numbers from the HZ=250 advocates, we > leave the default alone. Odd. Since I showed you some numbers already ... and nobody from the latency side of the argument has come up with any? M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
