On Sat, 2005-07-09 at 21:15 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 07:31:04PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > On Sat, 2005-07-09 at 19:05 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > > > +static void force_sig_info_fault(int si_signo, int si_code, > > > > + unsigned long address, struct > > > > task_struct *tsk) > > > > > > This won't work with a unit-at-a-time compiler which happily > > > inlines everything static with only a single caller. Use noinline > > > > but.... the x86 kernel is -fno-unit-at-a-time.... for stack reasons ;) > > The gcc people are making noises of removing that. So eventually > it will need to go.
the gcc people also fixed the stack usage on inlining (at least this specific class) in CVS HEAD so the "problem" is a lot smaller whenever they make it go away. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
