* Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 09:42:20PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > >
> > > > +static void force_sig_info_fault(int si_signo, int si_code,
> > > > + unsigned long address, struct
> > > > task_struct *tsk)
> > >
> > > This won't work with a unit-at-a-time compiler which happily inlines
> > > everything static with only a single caller. Use noinline
> >
> > this function has two callers.
>
> Even then it's still better to mark it noinline, otherwise a different
> inlining algorithm in a new compiler might do the wrong thing. It's
> also useful documentation.
ok, agreed. Delta patch below.
Ingo
----
make force_sig_info_fault() noinline, suggested by Andi Kleen.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux/arch/i386/mm/fault.c.orig
+++ linux/arch/i386/mm/fault.c
@@ -199,8 +199,8 @@ static inline int is_prefetch(struct pt_
return 0;
}
-static void force_sig_info_fault(int si_signo, int si_code,
- unsigned long address, struct task_struct *tsk)
+static noinline void force_sig_info_fault(int si_signo, int si_code,
+ unsigned long address, struct task_struct *tsk)
{
siginfo_t info;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
