On 01/28/2015 02:11 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > Actually, if clang is guaranteed to emit the correct register name > inside the inline asm for register asm variables used in input or > output constraints, I think it makes sense to #define __asmeq as a nop > if __clang__ is defined. (Note that __asmeq only exists to work around > a specific GCC bug)
I agree completely. Behan, what do you think? -Alex -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/