On 01/27/2015 01:25 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On 01/27/2015 03:10 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>>> >> + if (mem->n <= count) {
>>>> >> > + cma_release(cma, mem->p, mem->n);
>>>> >> > + count -= mem->n;
>>>> >> > + kfree(mem);
>>>> >> > + } else {
>>>> >> > + cma_release(cma, mem->p, count);
>>>> >> > + mem->p += count;
>>>> >> > + mem->n -= count;
>>>> >> > + count = 0;
>>>> >> > + cma_add_to_cma_mem_list(mem);
>>>> >> > + }
>>>> >> > + }
>> > If order_per_bit is not 0 and count used in cma_release() is
>> > different with the count used in cma_alloc(), problem could
>> > occur since bitmap management code can't handle that situation.
>> >
>> > Could we just disable this case in this testing module?
> How should it behave then? Just free a max of 'count' pages and
> stop beforehand if we're going to go over it?
Actually, Can I just check for order_per_bit == 0 and execute it
then? I don't want to avoid testing these paths.
Thanks,
Sasha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
