Le 14/01/2015 10:05, Arnd Bergmann a écrit : > On Wednesday 14 January 2015 00:47:59 Alexandre Belloni wrote: >> >> On 13/01/2015 at 15:09:56 -0800, Olof Johansson wrote : >>> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 03:43:00PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote: >>>> The entries are separated as ARM V4/V5 and ARM V7 as some other per-SoC >>>> config >>>> options may be removed in the near future. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.fe...@atmel.com> >>>> --- >>>> Hi Olof, >>>> >>>> This is an attempt to match other ARM SoC families format. >>>> If you feel that the patch can be good, do not hesitate to take it >>>> yourself. I >>>> don't plan to integrate it in any of my pull-request so it can appear >>>> quickly in >>>> arm-soc and can be used by everyone. >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> If you see what Peter did, he split up the rules per-SoC based on how >>> things were selectable in Kconfig. Since you seem to have the Kconfig >>> entries already, how about doing the same? That way the same information >>> w.r.t. SoC family that you have as comments isn't lost either. >>> >> >> You didn't see the patch set yet because it depends on a lot of other >> series still being discussed but after the switch to multiplatform, the >> only config option left will be SOC_AT91RM9200, SOC_AT91SAM9 (both >> under SOC_SAM_V4_V5) and SOC_SAMA5, under SOC_SAM_V7. >> >> That's our plan, unless you feel that we should keep one config option >> per SoC. > > With the patches that I prepared last year, all of AT91SAM9 becomes > one small file, so there really isn't any need to have separate Kconfig > options.
Hi Olof, After what noted Alexandre and Arnd, don't you think my initial attempt was okay? Aka: ping ;-) Bye, -- Nicolas Ferre -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
