* Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i have just done a jack_test4.1 run, and indeed larger latencies seem
> to have crept in. (But i forgot to chrt the sound IRQ above the
> network IRQ, so i'll retest.)
with the sound irq chrt-ed to prio 90 the latencies look pretty good:
************* SUMMARY RESULT ****************
Total seconds ran . . . . . . : 300
Number of clients . . . . . . : 14
Ports per client . . . . . . : 4
Frames per buffer . . . . . . : 64
Number of runs . . . . . . . :( 1)
*********************************************
Timeout Count . . . . . . . . :( 0)
XRUN Count . . . . . . . . . : 0
Delay Count (>spare time) . . : 0
Delay Count (>1000 usecs) . . : 0
Delay Maximum . . . . . . . . : 18 usecs
Cycle Maximum . . . . . . . . : 637 usecs
Average DSP Load. . . . . . . : 36.3 %
Average CPU System Load . . . : 18.8 %
Average CPU User Load . . . . : 29.3 %
Average CPU Nice Load . . . . : 0.0 %
Average CPU I/O Wait Load . . : 0.0 %
Average CPU IRQ Load . . . . : 0.0 %
Average CPU Soft-IRQ Load . . : 0.0 %
Average Interrupt Rate . . . : 1680.1 /sec
Average Context-Switch Rate . : 14361.3 /sec
*********************************************
Delta Maximum . . . . . . . . : 0.00000
*********************************************
and this was with LATENCY_TRACE turned on.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
