On Sat, Jan 24 2015, "Vick, Matthew" <matthew.v...@intel.com> wrote:
> Good catch! I noticed this too and was getting a patch together to address > this. > > The difference is that I was planning on not silently accepting an invalid > VLAN ID to begin with and returning FM10K_ERR_PARAM if the VLAN was > invalid, which I think is a better approach for this situation. If it's > alright with you, I'll generate the patch shortly and credit you via your > Reported-by. Sure, do what you think is best. Rasmus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
