On 1/23/15, 4:50 PM, "Rasmus Villemoes" <li...@rasmusvillemoes.dk> wrote:
>On Sat, Jan 24 2015, "Vick, Matthew" <matthew.v...@intel.com> wrote: > >> Good catch! I noticed this too and was getting a patch together to >>address >> this. >> >> The difference is that I was planning on not silently accepting an >>invalid >> VLAN ID to begin with and returning FM10K_ERR_PARAM if the VLAN was >> invalid, which I think is a better approach for this situation. If it's >> alright with you, I'll generate the patch shortly and credit you via >>your >> Reported-by. > >Sure, do what you think is best. > >Rasmus Sounds good. I'll get the patch created and validated through Jeff's tree. Cheers, Matthew -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
