Nigel Cunningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 22:04, Matthew Garrett wrote: >> Do you implement the entire swsusp userspace interface? If not, removing >> it probably isn't a reasonable plan without fair warning. > > I'm not suggesting removing the sysfs interface or replacing system to > ram - just the suspend to disk part.
Right, so you support the resume from disk trigger in sysfs and the /proc/acpi/sleep interface? If suspend2 is a complete dropin replacement then I'm much happier with the idea of dropping swsusp, but I don't want to have to tie suspend/resume scripts to kernel versions. -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
