On Wed, Jan 21, 2015, at 14:26, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Alexander van Heukelum > <heuke...@fastmail.fm> wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 18, 2015, at 13:05, Borislav Petkov wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> btw, you might wanna sync with Denys who's doing cleanups in that area too: > >> > >> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1421272101-16847-1-git-send-email-dvlas...@redhat.com > >> > >> and touching some of the stuff you're changing too. > > > > Thanks. FWIW, the change touches the same area in code, but is orthogonal > > in concept. > > My patches eventually eliminate both ARGOFFSET and KERNEL_STACK_OFFSET. > For example, eventually TI_flags tests look like this after all my patches: > > testl $const, TI_flags+THREAD_INFO(%rsp,SIZEOF_PTREGS) > > Your patches massage the same defines in a different way than mine do. > We clearly have a conflict here.
Indeed. I missed that, because Borislav's link only pointed to a single change and I failed to notice the "[01/11]" in the title. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
