On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 15:02 +0200, Ondrej Zary wrote: > > Ok, looks alright for both. Your machine is quite slow, perhaps that is > > showing the slower performance. Can you try and make HZ 100 in 2.6 and > > test again? 2.6.13-recent has it as a config option, otherwise edit > > include/asm/param.h appropriately. > > > > I forgot to write that my 2.6.12 kernel is already compiled with HZ 100 > (it makes the system more responsive). > I've just tried 2.6.8.1 with HZ 1000 and there is no difference in HDD > performance comparing to 2.6.12.
OK, interesting. You could try and boot with profile=2 and do # readprofile -r # dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/null bs=128k # readprofile > prof_output for each kernel and post it here, so we can see if anything sticks out. -- Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
