On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net> wrote:
> I think you need ist_begin_non_atomic() before local_irq_enable() and
> ist_end_non_atomic() after local_irq_disable(). Otherwise it should
> be good.
In your x86/paranoid branch you added:
prev_state = ist_enter(regs);
.... body of do_machine_check() here ...
ist_exit(regs, prev_state);
Does that override the previous advice? Or do I still need something before
I call local_irq_enable() and after local_irq_disable()?
-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
