On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Griffis, Brad <bgrif...@ti.com> wrote:
> How are you configuring ti,charge-delay in your dts? I've seen this behavior > on some custom boards where we were using a smaller charge delay (0x400) to > begin with, and by upping it to 0xb000 we resolved the issue. These patches > however already specified ti,charge-delay = 0xb000 by default so this would > surprise me that it's still seeing that issue. Was the touchscreen working > as expected before these new patches, or does it have issues both ways? Initially I had set the charge-delay to 0x400 and I was seeing many false pen-down/pen-up events With 0xb000, I was still getting many of them but less than with 0x400. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
