On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 07:48:22PM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> The range check in setup_res() checks the IO range against
> iomem_resource. That's just wrong.
>
> Move the check into a separate function and use ioport_resource for IO
> ranges.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
> ---
> arch/x86/pci/acpi.c | 51
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> Index: tip/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
> ===================================================================
> --- tip.orig/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
> +++ tip/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
> @@ -240,12 +240,41 @@ static acpi_status count_resource(struct
> return AE_OK;
> }
>
> +static bool valid_resource_range(struct resource *r, struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct resource *ior;
> + u64 end;
> +
> + ior = (r->flags & IORESOURCE_IO) ? &ioport_resource : &iomem_resource;
> +
> + /*
> + * Exclude non-addressable range or non-addressable portion of
> + * range. We only check end because ior->start is always 0.
> + */
> + end = r->end;
> + r->end = min(r->end, ior->end);
> + if (r->end <= r->start) {
> + dev_info(dev, "host bridge %s window [%#llx-%#llx] invalid
> range\n",
> + r->flags & IORESOURCE_IO ? "io" : "mem",
I think you can simplify this and below even further as the check
Iagainst ORESOURCE_IO is done already when selecting the ior thing (diff
Iontop):
---
Index: b/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
===================================================================
--- a/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c 2014-12-12 15:54:40.856317113 +0100
+++ b/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c 2014-12-12 15:53:16.832319561 +0100
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ static bool valid_resource_range(struct
r->end = min(r->end, ior->end);
if (r->end <= r->start) {
dev_info(dev, "host bridge %s window [%#llx-%#llx] invalid
range\n",
- r->flags & IORESOURCE_IO ? "io" : "mem",
+ ior->name,
(unsigned long long)r->start, end);
return false;
}
@@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ static bool valid_resource_range(struct
return true;
dev_info(dev, "host bridge %s window [%#llx-%#llx] truncated to
[%#llx-%#llx]\n",
- r->flags & IORESOURCE_IO ? "io" : "mem",
+ ior->name,
(unsigned long long)r->start, end,
(unsigned long long)r->start, (unsigned long long)r->end);
return true;
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
