On Thu, 11 Dec 2014, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > It looks like an impressive saving 116 -> 60 cycles. I just don't see > the same kind of improvements with my similar tests[1][2].
This is particularly for a CONFIG_PREEMPT kernel. There will be no effect on !CONFIG_PREEMPT I hope. > I do see the improvement, but it is not as high as I would have expected. Do you have CONFIG_PREEMPT set? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
