On Fri 2014-11-28 18:07:37, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Tue 2014-11-25 11:15:08, Seth Jennings wrote:
> > This commit introduces code for the live patching core.  It implements
> > an ftrace-based mechanism and kernel interface for doing live patching
> > of kernel and kernel module functions.

[...]

> > +static int klp_enable_object(struct module *pmod, struct klp_object *obj)
> > +{
> > +   struct klp_func *func;
> > +   int ret;
> > +
>       if (WARN_ON(obj->state != KLP_DISABLED))
>               return -EINVAL;
> 
> > +   if (WARN_ON(!obj->mod && obj->name))
> > +           return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +   if (obj->relocs) {
> > +           ret = klp_write_object_relocations(pmod, obj);
> 
> I was curious why the relocation is here. I think that the motivation
> was to safe the call when handling comming modules.
> 
> IMHO, more clean solution would be to do this in klp_init_object().
> It will also cause removing the "pmod" parameter and this function
> will be more symmetric with klp_disable_object();
> 
> I was curious how it would work, so I prepared a patch. I will send
> it in separate mail.

The patch is below. Again, merge it into the original patch if you
agree with the idea, please.


>From ba3b08938b6f6f1a041af645ff43825f2ec1222f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Mladek <pmla...@suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 15:57:23 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] livepatch: do relocation when initializing the patch

I think that the relocation is done in klp_enable_object() because
it safes the duplication in klp_module_notify_coming().

But I think that the relocation logically belongs to the init phase.
It will remove duplicate relocation if we allow repeated enable/disable
calls for the same patch. Also it removes the extra "pmod" parameter
from klp_enable_object() and makes it more symmetric with klp_disable_object().

This patch moves also the klp_find_object_module() to the init phase
where it belongs.

Finally, it moves some checks from callers to klp_write_object_relocation().
They must be there in each case. It makes the code easier when calling
from more locations.

Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmla...@suse.cz>

---
 kernel/livepatch/core.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/livepatch/core.c b/kernel/livepatch/core.c
index 9b1601729014..688a6b66e72f 100644
--- a/kernel/livepatch/core.c
+++ b/kernel/livepatch/core.c
@@ -204,6 +204,14 @@ static int klp_write_object_relocations(struct module 
*pmod,
        int ret;
        struct klp_reloc *reloc;
 
+       /* nope when the patched module has not been loaded yet */
+       if (obj->name && !obj->mod)
+               return 0;
+
+       /* be happy when there is nothing to do */
+       if (!obj->relocs)
+               return 0;
+
        for (reloc = obj->relocs; reloc->name; reloc++) {
                if (!obj->name) {
                        ret = klp_verify_vmlinux_symbol(reloc->name,
@@ -313,7 +321,7 @@ static int klp_disable_object(struct klp_object *obj)
        return 0;
 }
 
-static int klp_enable_object(struct module *pmod, struct klp_object *obj)
+static int klp_enable_object(struct klp_object *obj)
 {
        struct klp_func *func;
        int ret;
@@ -322,12 +330,6 @@ static int klp_enable_object(struct module *pmod, struct 
klp_object *obj)
        if (obj->name && !obj->mod)
                return 0;
 
-       if (obj->relocs) {
-               ret = klp_write_object_relocations(pmod, obj);
-               if (ret)
-                       goto unregister;
-       }
-
        for (func = obj->funcs; func->old_name; func++) {
                ret = klp_find_verify_func_addr(func, obj->name);
                if (ret)
@@ -402,8 +404,7 @@ static int __klp_enable_patch(struct klp_patch *patch)
        pr_notice("enabling patch '%s'\n", patch->mod->name);
 
        for (obj = patch->objs; obj->funcs; obj++) {
-               klp_find_object_module(obj);
-               ret = klp_enable_object(patch->mod, obj);
+               ret = klp_enable_object(obj);
                if (ret)
                        goto unregister;
        }
@@ -445,10 +446,17 @@ static void klp_module_notify_coming(struct module *pmod,
        pr_notice("applying patch '%s' to loading module '%s'\n",
                  pmod->name, mod->name);
        obj->mod = mod;
-       ret = klp_enable_object(pmod, obj);
+       ret = klp_write_object_relocations(pmod, obj);
        if (ret)
-               pr_warn("failed to apply patch '%s' to module '%s' (%d)\n",
-                       pmod->name, mod->name, ret);
+               goto err;
+
+       ret = klp_enable_object(obj);
+       if (!ret)
+               return;
+
+err:
+       pr_warn("failed to apply patch '%s' to module '%s' (%d)\n",
+               pmod->name, mod->name, ret);
 }
 
 static void klp_module_notify_going(struct module *pmod,
@@ -674,15 +682,18 @@ static int klp_init_objects(struct klp_patch *patch)
                return -EINVAL;
 
        for (obj = patch->objs; obj->funcs; obj++) {
-               /* obj->mod set by klp_object_module_get() */
                obj->state = KLP_DISABLED;
+               klp_find_object_module(obj);
 
-               /* sysfs */
+               ret = klp_write_object_relocations(patch->mod, obj);
+               if (ret)
+                       goto free;
+
+               /* sysfs stuff */
                obj->kobj = kobject_create_and_add(obj->name, &patch->kobj);
                if (!obj->kobj)
                        goto free;
 
-               /* init functions */
                ret = klp_init_funcs(obj);
                if (ret) {
                        kobject_put(obj->kobj);
-- 
1.8.5.2


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to