2014-11-27 21:53+0200, Nadav Amit:
> Radim Krčmář <rkrc...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > - new->cid_mask = (1 << KVM_X2APIC_CID_BITS) - 1;
> > - new->lid_mask = 0xffff;
> > + new->cid_mask = new->lid_mask = 0xffff;
> You set cid_mask to 0xffff, while there are only 16 clusters. I think it is
> risky (if you twist my hand would come with a scenario).
Let's see :) APIC id is 8 bit, and we compute cluster part of LDR by
taking four upper bits, so 16 is enough.
It isn't the safest programming practice, but we already fail to check
physical_map bounds and any boost to maximal APIC ID is going to require
a rewrite, thus I didn't bother to do it ...
All uses should be covered with the following hunk, I will add it to v2
after all reviews,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
index 6c2b8a5..30e4cc1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static void recalculate_apic_map(struct kvm *kvm)
cid = apic_cluster_id(new, ldr);
lid = apic_logical_id(new, ldr);
- if (lid)
+ if (lid && cid < ARRAY_SIZE(map->logical_map))
new->logical_map[cid][ffs(lid) - 1] = apic;
}
out:
> Yet, why not to set
> cid_mask to (ARRAY_SIZE(map->logical_map) - 1) ?
We would incorrectly deliver messages intended for high clusters,
it has to be 0xffff.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
