----- Original Message ----- > Jason Wang <jasow...@redhat.com> writes: > > Buggy host may advertised buggy host features (a usual case is that host > > advertise a feature whose dependencies were missed). In this case, driver > > should detect and disable the buggy features by itself. > > Sorry, I've been focussing elsewhere. > > I would really prefer that drivers offer a "feature_depends" table, > which can indicate that feature A depends on feature B, and have the > core iterate, complain and fixup as necessary. > > Is that expressive enough, or do we need more? > > Thanks, > Rusty.
I suggested something like this in https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/11/19/132, but Michael does not like it ... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
