On 21/11/14 14:40, Suthikulpanit, Suravee wrote:
>
>
> On 11/21/14, 19:57, "Marc Zyngier" <marc.zyng...@arm.com> wrote:
>
>>> + gic: interrupt-controller@e1101000 {
>>> + compatible = "arm,gic-400", "arm,cortex-a15-gic";
>>> + interrupt-controller;
>>> + #interrupt-cells = <3>;
>>> + #address-cells = <2>;
>>> + #size-cells = <2>;
>>> + reg = <0x0 0xe1110000 0 0x1000>,
>>> + <0x0 0xe112f000 0 0x2000>,
>>> + <0x0 0xe1140000 0 0x10000>,
>>> + <0x0 0xe1160000 0 0x10000>;
>>> + interrupts = <1 8 0xf04>;
>>
>> Are you sure about this one? ARM systems usually have this wired on PPI9
>> (interrupt 25)...
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> M.
>
> I think you might be right. GIC-400 TRM says that this is should be
> 25, and used for virtual maintenance interrupts. How can I verify
> this in Linux? KVM?
KVM is one way, but you'll never see the interrupt firing (we kill the
interrupt while in HYP, before the kernel gets a chance to see it).
If you effectively have GIC400 on this system, then I know for sure this
is interrupt 25.
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
